Hook Logo
Search

COVER- Hard row to hoe: Can local food movement save farmers?


Published March 5, 2009 in issue 0809 of the Hook
Bookmark and Share


With less than two months left on her land lease, farmer Connie Hicks is desperate to find a new home for her cattle operation.
PHOTO BY JEN FARIELLO

Forget Pop Tarts and Cocoa Krispies. These days, some children are more likely to beg for "Toaster Pastries" or "Koala Crisp," the organic versions of the popular Kellogg's treats. Locally grown food, too, has exploded out of its niche at the City Market and at stores like Rebecca's Natural Foods and is now popping up on shelves in places such as Reid's Super Save Market, where it once would have seemed as out of place as Donald Trump at a flea market.

 

The increase in supply and the ease with which shoppers can now fill their baskets with locally grown and raised veggies and meats is thanks to growing consumer awareness of the benefits such local food provides not only for health but also for the environment and for our now tanking economy.

According to the Piedmont Environmental Council, the average distance food travels before landing on dinner plates is a tortuous 1,500 miles. And according to the Virginia Cooperative Extension, if every Virginia household spent just $10 a week on locally produced food, it would add a whopping billion dollars to the state's economy every year. 

To help bring this about, several new organizations are working to connect farmers to consumers, and "beyond organic" farmer Joel Salatin, founder of Polyface Farms in Swoope, Virginia, will be speaking at two upcoming events aimed at increasing awareness among Central Virginia landowners and food consumers of the value of contributing to the local food chain.

"There are so many opportunities for farmers right now," Salatin insists.

But despite Salatin's optimism-- and the clear demand for local food in Charlottesville-- one local cattle farmer says her way of life has gone from hard to nearly impossible in Albemarle County, where pastureland is becoming scarce, thanks to development and to new landowners who seem more interested in manure-free country getaways than in living alongside the day-to-day operations of a working livestock farm.

 

The end of a way of life?

Her Ford 350 bouncing over ruts as she heads toward a herd of peacefully grazing black angus cattle, 42-year-old Connie Hicks throws her head back and laughs as a reporter clinging to the hay-rolling apparatus on the back of the lurching truck shrieks and is nearly thrown to the ground. 

 

 

"You gotta be tough to be a farmer," Hicks shouts through the open rear window of the truck's cab. She should know: a fourth generation farmer, Hicks grew up tending cattle, mending fences, and rolling hay with her father and grandfather on more than a dozen farms in Albemarle County. She continued to work with her father, Conrad Hicks, as an adult, planning to take over the operation when he retired. 

That day came sooner than anyone expected, when Conrad fell off a baler onto a concrete slab two years ago at age 75 sustaining a life-altering head injury that coincided with the onset of Alzheimer's. 

Although her father still enjoys spending time in the fields with his daughter, the family farming operation fell to Hicks, who has worked alone since then to manage a herd of more than 200 cattle and had hoped to eventually pass the family farming tradition along to her 8-year-old son, Gage.

But life as she knows it may soon end: the lease on a 500-acre tract in Free Union-- the Hicks' last remaining farm-- is up at the end of April, and Hicks, despite her family's long farming history in this area, has been unable to secure a new lease despite an increasingly desperate search.

"I'm going to have to sell them all," says Hicks, all traces of laughter erased as she tosses hay to about two dozen cows and calves milling around her in the field. "I've raised them all since they were babies," she says softly. "It's devastating."

If life as a farmer has always been hard, these days, says Hicks, it's brutal. Land prices in Albemarle have skyrocketed since her childhood, making it impossible for most cattle farmers who haven't inherited a farm to purchase their own land. Development has steadily gobbled land once leased to raise livestock. On any drive along meandering county roads, there are clues hinting at the agricultural history of the land in the names of the new developments: Cory Farm,  Blandemar Farm Estates. Despite the F-words, there are no cows on these tracts.

 

Not alone

Hicks isn't the only cattle farmer who has struggled to find land in the county. Ramona Huff, owner of Gryffon's Aerie, says she feared she'd have to shut her grass-fed beef business down when she lost her lease in 2007.

"We looked for about eight months," says Huff, a former advertising exec who turned cattle farmer in 1999 with the goal of supplying  "superior" grass-fed beef.

"We were out there saying, 'We don't want a free ride. We will pay top dollar,'" Huff recalls. "Even saying that, it was still really hard to find."

Fortunately, Huff and her husband, Collins, connected with the owners of Mount Air Farm, another grass-fed cattle business on Brown's Gap Turnpike past White Hall. 

"They'd used our bull a couple of years," says Huff. "When they decided to close down their operation, they said, why don't you move the whole shooting match?"

An added benefit of the move was Mount Air's already established on-site market, which is open on Saturdays. Huff says beef business has been brisk.

"People are willing to come out here," she says. "People don't mind the inconvenience."

Huff believes her good fortune in finding a new lease-- and in having people willing to come to her-- stems from the care with which she approaches farming.

"Farmers have to take pride in what they do," she says. "I'm conscious of where I drive my tractor when it's muddy. I'm very conscious of where I feed cattle in winter because I'm renting someone else's land."

As for selling her meat on site, she says, "People expect things to be beautiful. They don't want to see a lot of crud laying around."

Huff's advice mirrors that of Joel Salatin, author of books on farming and owner of Polyface Farms, where he has an "open door" policy, welcoming visitors to see any facet of his farming operation during operating hours Monday through Saturday.

Salatin says the key to convincing landowners to allow farming is to show them the benefit.

"Right now," he says, "I can't imagine one of our landlords kicking us off because all of them are so pleased with the healing that they see on the land."

Among signs of healing, he says, are "thicker, greener grass, fewer weeds, no thistles," traits he attributes to "very intensive managed grazing" in which he moves cattle regularly and lets his chickens follow behind to aerate the manure to help fertilize.

Salatin's success would be hard, if not impossible, to rival. His meat-- beef, pork, chicken and rabbit-- is featured on a slew of area restaurant menus, and he scored a national first: getting local meat into a fast food restaurant, when Chipotle Grill in the Barracks Road Shopping Center began using his pork last year.

Like Huff, who will share the stage with him at a March 7 panel discussion on farming at PVCC, Salatin says land owners need to be taught "not to be fearful of farmers." 

At the upcoming events, he says, "I'm going to be talking about things to look for in a farmer, both character and whatever his home base is, so that you as a landowner aren't getting a pig in a poke." (The second Salatin event will be held March 14 at the Montessori Community School on Pantops. See box for details.)

Among criteria landowners should use when seeking out a farming tenant, says Salatin: "look at their fields and see if that's the way you'd like your place to look, including looking at their fences. Look at their animals, look at what they're currently doing."

Beyond that, he says, landowners should educate themselves about "landhealing farming" so they can be more discerning about the farmers they rent to.

 

Farm to table

While Salatin and Huff are already succeeding in getting their product to market, two new organizations have sprung up specifically to address small farmers' need to reach consumers in a broader and more consistent way.

The Local Food Hub is the brainchild of local wine grape-grower Marisa Vrooman and Kate Collier, owner of the Feast! gourmet shop on West Main Street. The Food Hub will be a food distribution service that Collier hopes will solve one of the main difficulties faced by small farmers: providing a stable clientele that the farmer can count on. By carrying $3 million liability insurance-- and by providing food "traceability"-- the Local Food Hub will meet requirements of large food distributors and institutions like UVA, which recently announced an ambitious plan to increase its portion of locally grown food to 25 percent in its food services division.

"The Food Hub will be a large customer to these farms," providing some financial stability, says Collier, who hopes that level of support will help younger people enter the farming industry. 

"It's time to get a new generation going," says Collier, who cites a Piedmont Environmental Council datapoint that the average age of Albemarle County farmers is 59.

Collier recently lost a battle to win a portion of a $250,000 fund designated by Albemarle County for economic development. Although the County rejected the Hub's appeal, the publicity generated by the effort served a purpose.

"We've raised $165,000," exclaims Collier, who says that amount puts the nonprofit Hub within $65,000 of its stated $230,000 needed to launch in June. 

Ted Corcoran and Neal Halvorson-Taylor are also getting in on the local food action with the web-based local food business Virginia's Bounty. Like the Food Hub, Virginia's Bounty asked the County for funding assistance, and was rejected. Their start-up costs, however, are significantly lower-- requiring mostly labor to get an interactive website up and running and to recruit farmers.

The site-- virginiabounty.com-- will allow consumers to order  specific foods and quantities from local farmers, who will sell their wares through the site, and then Virginia's Bounty will arrange for pick-up spots around town. 

Collier and Halvorson-Taylor both say there is plenty of room in the market, and that neither new business should interfere with Community Supported Agriculture outfits like Horse & Buggy and The Best of What's Around, just two of the half dozen or so CSAs which provide a weekly dose of produce for an up-front fee.

Virginia's Bounty, says Halvorson-Taylor, is "for those who don't want to make the upfront investment, who may not be around here every week."

 

Land-locked

These connecting services will be a boon to farms that have a ready-to-eat product to sell. But for Hicks and other cattle farmers who don't have their own beef label like Polyface or Gryffon's Aerie, the efforts won't help-- at least not immediately.

Hicks-- like most Virginia cattle farmers-- makes her money by selling calves at auction. Those calves are sent to feedlots or to larger farms, where most are grain-fed and then slaughtered for meat.

"I really want to start my own label," says Hicks. But without a farm on which to raise the cattle, there's little hope of that dream being realized.

Finding land is not the only problem Hicks is facing. After her father's injury, Hicks' mother wanted to sell her the remaining farm property including tractors, hayloading trucks, and balers. Hicks says that the value of the property is approximately $500,000, and her mother needed only $100,000 to pay off the remaining loans.

"Farm Credit turned me down," says Hicks, who says the rejection was based on her tax return showing meager earnings and that they ignored the collateral she offered, including the equipment and the equity in her own house. "They don't help farmers," Hicks insists.

Representatives from Farm Credit did not immediately return the Hook's call.

Dan Maupin is another Albemarle County cattle farmer feeling the pinch. At 83, Maupin is still working his farm full time, but he says it gets harder to make a living year by year.

"Fertilizer is way up," he says, while the price of calves has declined over the last year from a high of about $1.65 a pound to the current rate of about $1. 

He's also afraid that Albemarle County might do away with some of the Land Use Taxation, which grants a reprieve to landowners who use their property for some type of agricultural business.

"That would be really hard to take," he says, of the potential soaring cost in land taxes.

According to County Assessor Bob Willingham, the county has 5,000 properties in Land Use, which translates into a loss of millions of dollars in potential tax revenues. But despite regular discussions at budget time, Albemarle County Supervisor Ann Mallek says the Board has no intention of getting rid of land use taxation. It did, however, recently pass an ordinance requiring "revalidation" of land use every two years. Property owners who are enrolled in the Land Use program will be required to provide proof of how the farm has been used.

Hicks points out that Land Use-- while a boon to farmers-- also provides the perfect justification for wealthy estate owners to reject livestock operations. By rolling hay that is sold to feed livestock, the owners of plush estates can qualify for the same tax break as if they had cattle on their land.

That, says Hicks, is what happened at Jumping Branch Farm on Garth Road across from Foxfield where Hicks and her father kept cattle for years and where the former owner still remembers them fondly.

"I cannot speak too highly of them," says former Jumping Branch owner Elizabeth Hamilton of Connie and Conrad Hicks, who ran cattle on her land until she sold the farm following the death of her husband, Howard Hamilton. "My husband," she adds, "was extremely pleased with every phase of the cattle operation."

The new owner of Jumping Branch, Ted Weschler, (a part-owner of this newspaper) says the decision to shun cattle was family preference. Ironically for someone who benefits from Land Use, he questions the wisdom of the County offering him such a tax break, even as he takes advantage of it.

"I don't consider myself a farmer," he says, "and to get the benefit as though I'm a farmer doesn't strike me as right."

Right or not, Weschler's far from the only estate owner getting the tax break for rolling hay. Hicks says CNET founder Halsey Minor and author John Grisham are two others. (Neither returned the Hook's calls by presstime.)

Hicks, for one, wishes some of them would reconsider their position and invite her and her cows onto their land.

"Farming's in my blood," she says. "It's all I've ever wanted to do."

If she doesn't find land soon, she says, she'll be facing a very different future than the one she had planned for herself and her son, following the seasons and living close to the land.

"I guess I could work at Target?" she ponders, before the reality of that thought seems to sink in, and she exhales: "Oh, God, I don't know what I'll do."

 

CORRECTION: The print version of this story gave an erroneous name for the bank that rejected Hicks' request for a loan. It has been corrected online. In addition, the original version incorrectly named Bundoran Farm as a cattle-free development. It is home to more than 200 cattle. Finally, an additional quote by former Jumping Branch farm owner Elizabeth Hamilton has been added online to clarify the context of her original statement.--ed.

 


Connie Hicks took over the family farming business after her father, Conrad Hicks, suffered a farming accident brain injury.
PHOTO BY JEN FARIELLO


Hicks, 42, has single-handedly managed a farm of over 200 cattle on a 500-acre Free Union property.
PHOTO BY JEN FARIELLO


Hicks has aspirations to start her own beef label--- but without the necessary land resources, it's a dream that may not come true.
PHOTO BY JEN FARIELLO>


Polyface Farms founder Joel Salatin will speak at two events in March aimed at raising awareness among landowners of the value of farming on their properties.
PHOTO COURTESY POLYFACE FARMS


"Farmers have to take pride in what they do," says Gryffon's Aerie owner Ramona Huff. "I'm conscious of where I drive my tractor when it's muddy. I'm very conscious of where I feed cattle in winter because I'm renting someone else's land."
PHOTO COURTESY GRYFFON'S AERIE

 

 

#

Comments

                     
Connie Hicks3/5/2009 11:41:09 AM

Thank you so much for such a wonderful article,,,on the farm..and my family..

Hopefully it will help out many farmers...who struggle for land...and trying to keep the family farm going...

I have already had one call from a land owner!!!!!

Thanks,

Connie

Cville Eye3/5/2009 11:02:06 PM

Thanks for the article. I understand better what Lonnie has been saying about Land Use Taxation as it is applied in Albemarle County.

Mark Crockett3/6/2009 1:39:57 PM

The Hook is to be commended for another article that gets at the ripple effect of Land Use taxation. A short while back The Hook published the following article by Lisa Provence that explained just who benefits from Land Use exemptions:

http://www.readthehook.com/Stories/2003/04/10/coverLandUseFarmersFriendO.html

I'm not surprised that the Farm Bureau did not return the Hook's phone calls....the Farm Bureau has supported the elimination of the Estate Tax, which would have benefited the wealthy....they plead that smalal farms are hurt – go out of busniess – due to that tax. I've asked them multiple times to cite a couple of small farms that failed beause of the Estate Tax...no response.

Albemarle County has 5,000 properties in Land Use, which accounts for 60% of all the land in the county. Yet, the revenue produced by farming and the jobs related to farming in the county are extremely small. No county in Virginia uses Land Use exemptions more than Albemarle County does. Real small farmers deserve it....big "gentlemen" farmers like those cited in the article – Weschler, Grisham, Minor – are another story.

The cost to the county in tax revenue eclipses the revenue-sharing agreement with Charlottesville (which was approved in a referendum by county voters years ago with 64% approval). Starangely, supervisors like Ken Boyd favoring renogiatating the revenue-sharing agreement but simply blink at the Land Use abuse.

In the interim, who is affaected by the expansive use of Land Use tax exemptions? People like Connie Hicks. Those who own quarter-, half- and one-acre lots with a house who pay full freight. County employees, who see pay and benefits reduced.

The current economic calamity should have made it very clear that there is a steep price to pay for tax cuts and breaks directed to those who do not need them. The so-called "trickle down" theory doesn't work....never has.

County citizens, employees, and real farmers deserve better.

Rex Linville3/6/2009 1:48:07 PM

Thanks for the great article and for highlighting this important issue. The Piedmont Environmental Council is working hard to promote and foster connections between landowners and farmers as part of our Buy Fresh Buy Local program. This is an essential part of saving both farmland and farms. As the article states, we have a workshop this Saturday on just this issue and for more information you can go to: www.pecva.org

Regarding Land Use taxation, there has never been a serious discussion by the Albemarle County BOS about getting ride of this program. Owners of farms, forests, and rural open space don't get this tax rate because of their participation in farming but instead because maintaining that land as real estate for agriculture, horticulture, forest, and opens space has public benefit. In fact, according to Virginia Cooperative Extension, all 50 states have some form of "use value" tax system for agricultural land. It may sound trite, but “cows don’t go to school” and this quip is a good way to explain the reality that open land does not require the same level of governmental services as "developed" land and as such it doesn’t make sense to tax open land at the same rate. Finally, despite land use rates on open land, farmland owners are still taxed at market value for the improvements on their property (their house and other structures) and for the land immediately around these improvements.

Thanks again for the great article,

Rex Linville

Piedmont Environmental Council

Courteney Stuart3/6/2009 1:53:59 PM

Dear Mr. Crockett,

Thanks for reading and commenting on this article. There is an error in the print version of this article, which has been corrected online and noted above. In fact, it was not Farm Bureau that rejected Connie's Hicks' loan request; it was Farm Credit. I have apologized to Farm Bureau for the error and will be running a correction in next week's issue. I also apologize to readers for any confusion this has caused, and to Farm Credit, whose response I am still awaiting.

Sincerely,

Courteney Stuart

Mark Crockett3/6/2009 4:16:47 PM

Thanks for the correction you cite Courteney....but that does not change the Farm Bureau's support for tax exemptins - the Estate Tax - for example – that primarily benefit the wealthiest.

I can appreciate Mr. Linville's view that those who get the Land Use exemptin must pay market tax rates on their houses....but surely he also knows that to qualiify for land use, one must own 20 acres or more. Most county residents do not. Moreover, there are few true working farms - in the literal sense of the term - in the county, but 5000 properties and 60% of the land are in Land Use.

Mr. Linville says that "cows don't go to school." True, but kids do and one must assume that some of those who benefit from Land Use exemptions have children in public schools. Additionally, public schools do, in fact, serve to benefit all. The original purpose of public education – which the wealthiest Virginians fought (Jefferson's plan to provide a "free" public education through 3rd grade was defeated a number of times) – was to promote democratic citizenship and the maintenance of democratic governance.

Mr. Linville says that providing Land Use exemptins to the wealthiest for open space or horticulture has "public benefit." But it is an indirect benefit in the sense that the public cannot typically access those open spaces (they are private properties). The beneift the people "gain" is that the land is not developed. Of course, many of those who own the largest estates don't want to develop their land anyway, nor do they plan to. So, even though they can afford to pay the real estate taxes, the general public ends up, through Land Use, subsidizing their open spaces.

A few years back, a tax professor pursuing a divinity degree in Alabama found out that the state taxed its poorest citizens at 4 times the rate it taxed its wealhiest ones. She was aghast and asked her theology professors for advice. They suggested she make the issue her master's thesis. She did (Google Susan Pace Hamill and you can find the thesis in the 2002 Alabama Law Review....or read the New York Times article at http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/25/business/25tax.html?em&ex=1198818000&en=ded216f65342cce8&ei=5087%0A).

Hamill's thesis caused the Alabama governor to get a tax reform package from the legislature. But that package had to be approved by the voters. Then the radio and TV and print ads began, saying the package would be the "largest tax increase" in Alabama history; that thousands of jobs would be lost; that it would lead to desecreation perserved spaces. These claims were blatant deceptions.

When the vote came, every demographic group, including the poorest, voted against it.

Sometimes most of the people can be fooled.

Seriously3/6/2009 10:51:36 PM

Mark Crockett, bless you, whoever you are. You really hit the nail on the head, and thanks for the great link.

I don't have children, but I contribute my share of county taxes to public education. My unschooled dogs and cats do not earn me a tax break. I take beautiful care of my property and its natural resources, and will never subdivide it. Where's my reward for good stewardship?

Look, everyone knows the PEC is the wealthy person's environmental group. They have their parties at fabulous estates and people drop in for drinks by private helicopter. There's an enormous difference between how they fund-raise and how, for instance, an organization like the Legal Justice Center does it.

I have worked with and for many of the county's wealthiest landowners, and not a one of them would ever subdivide or develop their land. Nor would they ever need a hand out from the government to prevent them from doing so. They love to have lots of land to spread out on, because that provides them the essential elbow room they need to keep them separated from the hoi polloi.

Don't get me wrong-- the PEC does some great work, but never mistake their real mission, which is providing unsullied surroundings for the mega wealthy. If local food weren't trendy among the rich, the PEC wouldn't be supporting the concept. Some of us have been growing our own organic and natural food for decades before the PEC read about it Gourmet magazine and hopped on board the train. The PEC is welcome to ride along, just don't high-jack the train and paint your name on the side of it, okay?

farmboy3/7/2009 7:24:04 AM

Seriously, in case you didn't read the article above, PEC is hosting a workshop today called "Hosting the Small Farm Dream," and charging $10 to get in....hardly a wealthy person's event. Your jab at PEC's Buy Fresh Buy Local effort is pretty cynical. I don't see any other organization in the state maintaining a comprehensive database of local food sources, and sending out that information for free.

Seriously3/7/2009 10:11:56 AM

farmboy, I stated clearly that the PEC does some great work. However, I stand by my statement that one of its primary goals is protecting the land of its wealthy donors through government handouts. If they backed away from that stand, I would have a lot more respect for them.

I have a real problem with wealthy people being rewarded for doing the right (i.e. responsible) thing. Ever heard of noblesse oblige? The reality is that, in this instance, you're rewarding them simply for looking out for their own best interests. Are the neediest members of society rewarded with tax breaks for having fewer children? My income is poverty-level-- am I rewarded for maintaining a property that's free of all pesticides and other noxious chemicals?

Once again, they do some great work, and I appreciate that the Eat Local info is widely distributed for free. But I find the preferential treatment given their wealthy donors to be pretty sad, considering that the smaller farmers could really use some tax breaks too.

I have no problem with real "feet on the ground" farmers like Hicks, Salatin, and the Huffs receiving tax breaks for not only being good stewards of the environment, but for providing nutritious untainted food for the people of this area.

Perspective3/7/2009 1:11:34 PM

The PECs work in local food is a great addition to the community and should be viewed as important. However, there is so much other work being done on Ag in general that it's only one player, not the game. Respectfully,

Richard Daly3/11/2009 7:33:28 AM

I also cannot find farm land for grazing and hay making. My herd is quite a bit smaller and the land use is being abused by the wealthy estates. Thank you for bringing attention to one of the few small independent american industries left in this country.

common sense3/11/2009 1:41:57 PM

I own two houses in the county. One on two acres and one on 232 acres. I pay about 2600 EACH on the two homes and pay an additional 2000 on the land around the second home.

This is FAIR. The raw land is not using any county services and I have to pay INCOME tax on all of the farming operations. THe tax

"break" is really just a true reflection of the lands cost to the county to provide services. It is disingenous to point to some famous rich people and sat that they are are not paying their fair share. I imagine John grishams home is worth a cool two or three million and he gets NO DISCOUNT on that. He does get land use rates on the land.

There are different tax rates for everything from rental cars, hotel rooms food, services income etc and this is no different.

If the tax rates increased dramatically people would subdivied their land and sell off pieces to pay the tax bill. Those new homes would generate more expenditures for the county than the new tax collected.

Anybody that thinks it won't happen simply needs to look at Louden county in northern Va. People subdivied like crazy and they now have an entire county of mcmansions in the highest foreclosure area of the state.

At the end of the day the land use tax is fair. The county does not allow people to simple mow the grass. They MUST produce hay at a minimum. Anybody that tells you different is a liar. This is not the free ride that some folks would like you to believe.

Lastly, if you raise the tax on the land it will only be passed down to the consumer in the form of higher prices. (or I guess higher mystery novel prices?)

Seriously3/11/2009 1:59:04 PM

common sense-- I have no idea what your income bracket is, but you may well need the tax break provided by Land Use. How would you feel about the county not extending that tax break to multi-millionaires? What would you think about an income cap? (Serious question there)

My land is also not using any county services, nor do I have children using county schools, etc. What sort of tax break would you propose for me that's "fair" like the one you're getting?

common sense3/11/2009 2:44:43 PM

seriously, I have no children in school either. That is the point. A lot of the people who complain are those that are living in a 250k house with three kids paying 2500 in property taxes but consuming 36,000 a year educating their three kids. On top of that they get additional deductions and my cows never race up and down the downtown mall cussing in front of grandmothers.

If you want to make it "fair" then give them a bill for their actual consumption but of couse that could never work.

As for having millionairs lose the exemption they already pay much higher taxes than everyone else. the difference betwen me and a millionaire is that my house is worht 250k on my land and a millionaires is probaly two to three times that which means he already pays two to three times what I pay.

The top 3% of the population already pay 68% of the taxes. while the bottom 35% not only don't pay taxes but get direct government assisance through various programs.

The issue that no one wants to address is why it costs so much to fill a pothole or paint a fence when the government does it. The government also wastes money debatine and studying every little thing to death. If they had to EARN the money then it would be different.

The county budget should be done 18 months in advance and voted on so that WE decise how much they can spend, instead of them deciding how much they get to tax us.

table talk3/11/2009 2:47:00 PM

To seriously:

There is already a "fair" tax break for you, simply buy 21 acres of land and work your friggin ass off cutting hay, raising cattle or growing corn.

Whats the problem?

Seriously3/11/2009 3:23:20 PM

table talk, I stated clearly above that real farmers (i.e. the ones who "work their friggin ass off") SHOULD get a break! I don't think fake farmers who are multi-millionaires should get a tax break for mowing their grass and rolling it into a bale, or having a small herd of decorative sheep.

Farming is hard work that should be rewarded. Rewarding mega-wealthy fake farmers makes a mockery of the process.

table talk3/11/2009 3:54:53 PM

what about a millionaire who became a millionaire by by working his ass off abling hay or raising cattle? The tax break is not a subsidy. It is a fair representaion of the lands consumption of county services.

Think of it this way.

Two lots on a road, both one acre. One has a house and four kids and pays 2500 in taxes. The other sits undeveloped and pays 800.

This is fair.

So why is it all of a sudden unfair because the lot size changes?

Seriously3/11/2009 5:53:27 PM

If you can become a millionaire by baling hay and raising cattle on 21 acres, then you are to be commended!

My understanding is that this is handed out primarily to people who are not actually farmers, but rather those individuals who work their asses off writing novels, making CDs, managing hedge funds in NYC... and let's not forget those who work their asses off inheriting sizable trust funds from their relatives. Trustafarians in Carhartts? Those poor, poor dears need all the tax assistance they can get.

table talk3/11/2009 8:48:37 PM

It is funny how this article is about a loss of land for cattle. So the solution is to RAISE the taxes so that these cd makers etc will do what? Rent out their land to cattle producers to pay the tax increase? The cattle producers barely pay any rent now.

The current tax structure is fair based on the land use. These farmers pay personal property taxes on the house and 1 acre and a different rate on the raw land. If you raise the tax rate you will see lots sold off to pay the taxes and then you will get more developemnt requiring more roads and schools and thereby more taxes. That is what the folks realized when they instituted the policy. Think how many more developments there would have been in the last ten years building explosion if this had been repealed ten years ago.

Farm girl3/13/2009 3:16:42 PM

It really is troublesome that most of you who talk of land use do not really know all the standards of this process, one being you must be running it as a farm, not just empty pasture land and that it has been available to less than 20 acres. Then there is talk of John Grisham he has his land in preservation not to be subdivided how else are we too preserve the larger farms working now or for the future. I too pay taxes w/kids that do not utilize the public schools and not private school students but home schooled. I pay several thousands for education materials and pay real estate tax as well but no tax break here either. The assumption that every farmer small or large chooses to use or benefit from gov't subsidies once again is just a presumption. Fair or not if you don't start thinking ways to preserve the larger lots of land tax break to millionaires or the rest of us you will begin to see the small farm set up dissappear and those millionaires subdividing their property into a subdivision with restrictions on having chickens much less substainable farming. It seems that there is a lot of whining going on almost to the point it sounds like two kids fighting over a bigger part of the pie. It is true there are plenty of people out there in need of assistance as in the Hick's family. I do question why there is a need for her to purchase her home place from her parents it would seem more appropriate that she attempt to make it work while living with her parents maybe this is an antiquated position. In a time when it is a buyers market for real estate and not the seller's would the loan to her have been a handout considering the fact that her only other option should the farm fail was to work at Target? As for Ted Weschler if he feels bad for taking the tax break and that it is wrong why does he?


Your Name:
Your Email (optional):
Comment:
Word Count:
0
500 word limit
Image Verification:
Please type the letters above:
*  People say the darndest things, but if you use language stronger than "darn," ethnically or racially disparaging language, or compare people to Hitler, you may find that we've deleted the comment and/or blocked you from further commenting. Ditto for most unverified information, gross insults, potentially libelous statements, and veering off the topic. To avoid spam, all comments containing more than two weblinks are placed into a holding tank.



© 2002-2008 Better Publications LLC - The Hook - 100 Second Street NW - Charlottesville, VA 22902 - 434-295-8700 (fax: 434-295-8097) :Login: