Hook Logo
Search
window.addEvent('domready', initPops); function initPops() { /* url = "http://www.readthehook.com/blog/index.php/most-read/"; new Ajax(url, { method: 'get', update: $('mostRead') }).request();*/ Tabs1 = new mootabs('thisMonth', {height: '400px', width: '185px', changeTransition:'none',useAjax: true, ajaxUrl: '/blog/index.php/most-read/', ajaxLoadingText: '',ajaxOptions: {method:'get',evalScripts:'false'}}); }

THE TOUGH CUSTOMER- Ten percent solution? Digi-signals stoke fears of imperfect pictures


Published June 19,  2008 in issue 0725 of the Hook

"Television," says Bob Jenkins, Chief Engineer at Channel 29, the NBC affiliate here in town, "is imperfect."

He wasn't talking about the artistic content of shows, but about the quality of signals used to deliver those shows into our homes.

The government is requiring all television stations to transition from transmitting in analog signals to digital ones no later than February 17, 2009-- just eight months from now. The reason is to free up the limited number of analog frequencies currently used by television broadcasting for emergency services, such as police and fire, as well as for wireless broadband services.

If, like most people in the Charlottesville area, television comes into your home via cable or a satellite dish, this change won't affect you much.

Even if you rely on broadcast signals, if you bought your television within the last few years, it likely has a built-in digital receiver already. And the digital signals will be picked up by your antenna, just as the current analog signals are.

If your television set is older, however, it may be capable of receiving only the old-style signals, in which case you will need purchase an analog-to-digital converter in order to receive the new digital ones. You may be eligible to receive up to two coupons from the government worth $40 each toward the purchase of these devices, which cost around $50 and up.

The Federal Communications Commission maintains a web site that will answer most questions you may have about this whole ball of wax at http://www.dtv.gov/consumercorner.html.

According to the FCC, digital broadcasting provides many advantages to the viewer, including superior picture and digital sound.

But Larry Brown, who lives off Route 250 west of town, has had a different experience. Back in January, he switched to DirecTV, but was receiving broadcast signals via the antenna on his house for Channels 29 and 41 in our area. Now receiving those stations in digital, he was quite satisfied. The pictures, he wrote the Hook, "had never been better, and we looked forward to Channels 16, 19, and 27 [the area's ABC, CBS and FOX network affiliates, respectively] coming on line full strength so we could receive them as well."

But, Brown continued, "Just a few weeks ago the leaves on our tall trees came out full, and almost overnight the digital signals from Ch. 29 came in broken to the point of being unreadable. Ch. 41 digital still comes in fine."

Brown says his home is "just over 11 miles from all the local antenna."

Jenkins was surprised to hear about Brown's problem, given where he lives. He explains that the quality of the picture is determined by two factors: location and signal strength. "As a rule of thumb," he says, "if you got analog signals, you get digital signals."

Jenkins said that while leaves could affect digital signals, Channel 29's signal strength is much stronger than that of Channel 41, and he could not explain why Channel 29 would be affected at Brown's home while the weaker station would not. He speculated it could be an unusual bounce or reflection of the signals.

Channel 29 monitors its power output all times, Jenkins adds, which it is required to do by law; and the frequency on which it broadcasts, which is monitored by an outside company, deviates little, so he is confident in the integrity of his station's signals.

Roger Burchett, general manager of the Charlottesville Newsplex, which owns the CBS, ABC and Fox affiliates in town, did not return phone calls.

In any event, Brown warns, "The area around Charlottesville is likely to have some big surprises when the switchover is completed next February."

How big of a surprise remains to be seen. Jenkins says he is getting more calls these days about reception issues, but they still do not amount to significant numbers. Still, Brown's experience suggests that number might grow as we get closer to the February deadline and more households make the switch.

And while almost 90 percent of the 85,000 television households in the Charlottesville Designated Market Area get cable or satellite, according to non-profit trade group Television Bureau of Advertising, that means potential difficulties for 8,500 households in the region. While the odds are that the transition will be smooth for most, the fact that the Brown's signal problem stumped Jenkins could also be a signal that there will be more problems than Jenkins, or the FCC, anticipates. 

Got a consumer situation? Call the Hook newsroom at 434-295-8700x405 or e-mail the Tough Customer directly.

#

Comments

                     
dan11016/20/2008 1:50:28 PM

Weird. I live about 35 miles from Charlottesville and receive Channel 29.1 (digital) beautifully with just an indoor amplified antenna.

Maybe there is something metal in the vicinity that is interefering with this gentleman's signal. He should try moving his antenna around, if possible.

Mark6/20/2008 2:30:47 PM

My parents live in Short Pump and can get 29.1 without any interference 95 percent of the time. Interestingly, the Charlottesville NBC's digital channel is more reliable than any of the Richmond TV stations' digital signals.

Mike6/21/2008 3:26:20 PM

Yet another newspaper article that left out a LOT.

The Charlottesville market is unusual. Basically, only 29, 41 and the new CBS affiliate (WCAV/16) are full-power. Only full-power stations are required to make this change in February.

The other "Newsplex" stations (ABC, FOX) are low-power outlets. They aren't required to make the change, though they are more than welcome to construct low-power digital signals.

And as such, a quick check of the FCC database shows both the Newsplex low-power stations either have permits or licenses for "LD" (low-power digital) stations. Not being in the market, I have no idea if they have them running yet or not.

So, the problem turns from "analog vs. digital" to "low-power vs. full-power", as far as reception goes... "NBC29" is full-power, as is "CBS16" and 41...

Llew F.6/23/2008 6:20:28 PM

I'm not surprised Channel 29's Chief Engineer Bob Jenkins is stumped over Mr. Brown's signal reception problems. As Mr. Jenkins admits, Channel 29 relies on others to ensure the quality of its broadcast signal. Why didn't you find an expert opinion for this article?

In reality, reception of digital TV has less to do with location and signal strength and everything to do with digital encoding integrity and low bit error rates.

James W.6/26/2008 9:07:10 PM

Even though low-power TV stations aren't required to switch to digital, it would be bad business sense if they don't. It seems to me that The Newsplex stations are heading in that direction, which is good. WVIR has a digital signal in the Piedmont, but they market themselves as Augusta County's station, as well. If they want to continue serving that rapidly-growing market (along with parts of Rockingham County), it is imperative that they build one or more digital translators in the Shenandoah Valley, because WVIR-DT simply cannot come through because of the mountains. The analog translators currently broadcasting on channels 28 and 31 are shoddy, anyway, and no one is going to want to have to keep their old TV set up in their living room just to watch one channel if their new digital TV does not have dual tuners, as is the case with many new TVs, and most converter boxes. NBC29 has made significant in-roads into the Augusta market in recent years, chipping away at the WHSV TV3 monopoly, but a significant portion of these viewers may be lost completely, unless they have cable, but in this economy, cable may be a luxury to live without for many families. Then again, maybe that's WVIR's strategy: to stay on low-power analog while WHSV is forced off the band because of their full-power status; WVIR is betting on the majority of viewers in low-tech, old-fashioned Augusta County not being able to make the switchover in time. Now's there's irony for you. I just dismantled my entire argument in one sentence.

P.S. It would be nice to see CBS 19 build translator in the Valley for those viewers who are left out in the "broadcast blind spot" where they are too far north of Roanoke to receive WDBJ-DT, yet too far southwest of DC to recieve WUSA-DT (unless WUSA is planning to switch their channel 18 translator to digital and boost the power.)


Your Name:
Your Email (optional):
Comment:
Word Count:
0
500 word limit
Image Verification:
Please type the letters above:
*  People say the darndest things, but if they use language stronger than "darn," if they use ethnically or racially disparaging language, or start comparing people to Hitler, they may find that we've deleted the comment. Ditto for most unverified information, potentially libelous statements, and anything off the topic.



© 2002-2008 Better Publications LLC - The Hook - 100 Second Street NW - Charlottesville, VA 22902 - 434-295-8700 (fax: 434-295-8097) :Login: