Cat shooting prompts new gun law

George and Kathy Seymour leave Albemarle District Court on August 22.

She was just one family's pet, but the death of Carmen the cat may soon have an impact on every resident of Albemarle County.

On September 6, County attorney Larry Davis will present to the Board of Supervisors a draft ordinance that, if passed, will strengthen the county's laws on discharging firearms by creating "safety zones" around homes and other buildings. The move comes, Davis says, after prompting from Commonwealth's Attorney Jim Camblos in the wake of Carmen's April shooting in the posh Bentivar subdivision.

"When we were dealing with the cat killing case, and we went to try to get a warrant for discharging in a subdivision, we found that Bentivar and many others in the county were exempt," says Camblos. "We thought that was absolutely wrong."

While County code has long outlawed shooting in residential neighborhoods, many Albemarle subdivisions have been built in areas zoned rural, where shooting guns is permitted.
Bullets can easily travel between yards, and County Supervisor Chair Dennis Rooker says he fears for the safety of people in such neighborhoods.

"Camblos remarked to me that he was surprised to find there was no ordinance to prohibit shooting guns," says Rooker. "That motivated me to want to get something done in this area. For the protection of residents in the county, we need to do something that's reasonably restrictive."

As the Hook reported in its May 18 cover story, "Claws and effect: Bentivar shooting sparks outrage," Carmen was a three-year-old black cat who belonged to Klaus and Vanessa Wintersteiger and their two children. On the night of April 24, the family discovered her in the garage bleeding from bullet holes in her neck and front leg. They took Carmen to the emergency veterinary clinic, but learned that extensive surgery to amputate her leg and shoulder had an uncertain outcome, and they decided to euthanize her.

The next day, the Wintersteigers contacted the police, who, by that afternoon, arrested the Wintersteigers' neighbor, businessman George Seymour, owner of the Import Car Store on Hydraulic Road and Emmet Street.

The case riled the community, pitting animal activists against those who believe the rights of property owners are trampled by free-roaming cats. Though Seymour admitted he'd shot the cat, he claimed it was in response to cats scratching the paint on expensive cars parked in his driveway.

When Seymour's wife, Kathy, testified that cats regularly scratched the car paint, often costing the couple from $600 to $1,600 per car, titters erupted in the courtroom. One paint professional says cats can inflict damage, but he disputes that figure as the cost of repairs.

"I've never had to repaint from a cat scratch," says Rick Lasocki, owner of Paint Perfections Unlimited. Cats, says Lasocki, "don't have enough weight behind them to physically scrape all the way through the paint."

Though he regularly sees "light little scratches," Lasocki says the majority of the fixes require "five minutes of wet sanding and buffing." The average cost: "about $60," he says.

For Seymour, who was convicted of misdemeanor animal cruelty in Albemarle District Court on August 22, the cost of defending his paint proved much higher. He'll spend 10 days behind bars and perform community service.

"I'd like to see the gun law change," says Susanne Kogut, executive director of the Charlottesville Albemarle SPCA.

Not everyone is enthusiastic about the prospect of losing the right to shoot in the 'hood, however. "It makes sense to some degree, but most people who have purchased property in the county enjoy that privilege," says Vicki Hale, co-owner of Woodbrook Sporting Goods, "so I'm sure there will be some opposition."

Camblos knows he'll take some heat, but he says it's worth it.

"I own guns, and I believe in a person's right to own and use a gun," he says. "But given the population of the county and the number of subdivisions that we have, shooting guns in one of those subdivisions should not be allowed."



Another gun law?? PLEASE. Next thing is a ban on the sling-shot.

It is already against the law to shoot within a certain number of feet of a dwelling in the rural county. It is already a crime to maliciously wound a pet. We don't need another law.

This looks like a grand-stand political move to capitalize on the death of a cat that is in the newspapers. Maybe take a little heat off from other issues.

On second reading, I see this:

ââ?¬Å?Camblos remarked to me that he was surprised to find there was no ordinance to prohibit shooting guns,”

I'm surprised to see such a statement from the man who has been Albemarle Couty's Commonwealth Attorney for 15 years. Shouldn't he know the laws by now? If he hasn't needed to look into this in all that time, maybe a new law isn't called for.

Don't get me wrong here... I definitely feel bad for this family and think what the Import Car Store dude did was incredibly wrong. But man, you guys have written so much about this thing that my eyes glaze over when I see "Bentivar cat killer" on this blog or in your pages. How many articles/letters/brief mentions/blog entries have you guys done on this? I would find this entry more interesting if I hadn't been beaten over the head with this story for the last several months by you guys. It's sad, but it's not the only thing going on in this town.

Hi, I would be very upset if was our cat. I don't think there is any excuse for this action and I don't think a strong enough message was sent through the Court System.
We don't need another gun law. We just need for people like the Seymour's to be more considerate of others. This was a child's pet and you can't replace one pet with another. A top of the line car can never give THE LOVE of one's CAT!!
Mr. Seymour, think before acting next time.