The judge has rendered a verdict on Interstate 64 shooting perpetrator Slade Woodson: 15 years for shooting into occupied cars and houses.
I read in the DP that alcohol is such a problem with Woodson. I think the piece also indicated he had a supportive family. He was allowed to drink as a child, age 12. How can the expert get by with a determination, supportive parents, as they allowed him to drink to excess as a young kid? Doesn't make sense to me?
plop - The DP read: Ã¢â?¬Å?But a doctor testified of another side to him, saying Woodson had a high tolerance for alcohol, consumed it without the knowledge of his family and friends and did dangerous things while drunk.”
yeah, i think that is fair.